On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:26:21PM +0100, Kov?cs Levente wrote: > Anyways... I have not yet decided which to use... I'd like to pay the > least. Poor guy from a technical university. > > Levente > > -- > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > AIM: ha5ogl > ICQ: 48710903 > MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yahoo!: kieg_tk16 > Home Page: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs > Public key: http://web.interware.hu/lekovacs/cuccok/public_key > > ________________________________________ > > /"\ > \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign > X against HTML email & vCards > / \ http://arc.pasp.de/ > > Have Fun, & Linux! 73 for all by HA5OGL. > This message was generated by Sylpheed.
Unfortunately neither is available under the GPL. Xilinx appears to be the only one that can be run legitimately under Linux. As I said before the Altera Windows version will not run under Wine due to their DRM/copy protection software. The Xilinx Webpack does run fine under most GNU/Linux distros, and is available for download. You can purchase a CD for the cost of shipping if the download is too big. Whatever you do, please respect the copyrights. It will look bad if you do not. If Altera will not release their software for your preferred OS at a reasonable cost, either don't use their chips or ask that they donate a license to your university. I would love to see a GNU FPGA sythesis tool, but realize that is unlikely considering the closed nature of the bitstream. It is something like selling a microprocessor with a secret instruction set. In the project I am currently working on, I am trying to do most of the work in a DSP rather than the FPGA so users can make more modifications without having to install non free sofware. Darrell Harmon http://dlharmon.com
