On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 09:26:50 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:

> But this bug also shows something else. Currently there are bug reports
> on several platforms:
> - - Sourceforge, which sucks
> - - github, which sucks too
> - - Debian bugtracker, which sucks less
> - - Bugzilla which is a pain in the ass
> - - ...
> 
> Some of the bugs are overlapping and no way to work on the bugs really.
> At least, one needs an account in all bugtrackers (except debian ones).
> 
> I believe, there is no one in here who have a overview over them all.

Then, for heaven's sake, why has the Geeqie project used the sf.net
bug tracker for several years? It can be disabled via the project admin
interface. No tracker => no tickets that end up in nirvana.

And if all those bug trackers suck in your opinion, is there one,
which you like? Some people like "trac", e.g. the fedorahosted.org project
service uses it.

The primary problem with Geeqie's own bug tracker at sf.net is that nobody
seems to pay attention to the tickets anymore. Whether bug reports should be
sent to this list instead, nobody knows.

About the distribution's own bug trackers, you don't need to know them,
less use them. Red Hat's bugzilla server is also the one used by the
Fedora Project. Typically, it is the Fedora package maintainer who
maintains tickets in that tracker and either forwards bug reports upstream
or asks the reporter to open a ticket in the upstream tracker. Same for
Debian. Bugs filed in a distribution's bug tracker may be specific to the
distribution.

For example, here's an exiv2 lib upgrade that somehow breaks Geeqie and
other graphics viewers in Fedora 23:

  geeqie  shows in the EXIF embedded image instead of the contents of a RAW 
file.
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1292255

It could be a bug in exiv2 or an API change. Whatever. If the distribution
package user reported that at Geeqie's sf.net bug tracker directly, the
downstream package would remain broken, unless a new Geeqie release would
fix it (or if the downstream packager would notice a fix in upstream git).
But if it's a bug in exiv2, activity would need to shift to that package
and/or upstream project.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Geeqie-devel mailing list
Geeqie-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geeqie-devel

Reply via email to