Nicolas Robidoux writes: > > For example, nohalo1 (same result as snohalo1 with smoothing = 0, but > runs faster) would be "sharper", snohalo1 with smoothing = 1 would be > "smoother", and snohalo1 with smoothing = .5 would be "halfandhalf," > or something kind of like that?
If there were only four named presets, I supposed they could be sharpest, sharp, smooth, smoothest corresponding to smoothness = 0, 1/3, 2/3 and 1. with the added bonus that smoothness = 1/3 kind of corresponds to the Mitchell-Netravali choice of smoothing/interpolation balance. Øyvind: Does the above seem like a good choice, or did I change your mind with my "smoothness slider" idea (or do you like neither)? Nicolas Robidoux Laurentian University _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
