On 09/30/2010 01:02 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Rupert Weber<g...@leguanease.org> wrote: >> More questions... >> >> 1. C standard >> The docs state "ANSI C" as a feature. Is that actually meant in the >> strict sense of C89, not C99? Does that hold for (babl-)extensions as >> well? I'm specifically thinking about inline and inttypes.h. > > GIMP tends to claim C89 compatibility; we shouldnt assume more modern > language standard than GIMP does.
Hi Øyvind What problems do you expect us to get if we begin to rely on an 11 year old standard instead of a 21 year old standard? At what time has enough time passed for us to feel comfortable using the improvements in C99? / Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ "Automatic tab style and removed tab title bar" _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
