Jokowi recently announced that he would set up a task force to tackle the 
issue of intolerance. “Apart from Muslims, Indonesia is also home to 
Christians, Catholics, Hindus, Buddhists and Confucians,” Jokowi said 
http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-38246456 earlier in the Bali Democracy 
Forum last week. “The peace values are upheld by all religious adherents in 
Indonesia.”
 However, as a politician he has also sought help from religious leaders and 
has left hard-line groups like the FPI alone.  Now, while maintaining a 
ostensibly neutral stance, Jokowi has effectively thrown Ahok under the bus, 
saying flatly http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-37906216: “I will not 
protect brother Basuki Tjahaja Purnama.”

 ...
 
 The Blasphemy Trial of Jakarta’s Governor Puts Indonesian Secularism in a 
Shockingly Poor Light 
http://time.com/4598716/ahok-trial-governor-jakarta-indonesia-blasphemy-islam/ 
Yenni Kwok http://time.com/author/yenni-kwok/ @yennikwok 
https://twitter.com/yennikwok  10:07 PM ET

 

 

 Jakarta Governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, popularly known as Ahok, center, sits 
on the defendant's chair at the start of his trial hearing at North Jakarta 
District Court in Jakarta on Dec. 13, 2016. Ahok is on trial on accusation of 
blasphemy following his remark about a passage in the Quran that could be 
interpreted as prohibiting Muslims from accepting non-Muslims as leaders

 

 

 
 Indonesia's top Christian official hounded by Islamists. Not what the 
country's founding fathers had in mind On Monday, the Governor of Jakarta, 
Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, attended a celebration of the Prophet Muhammad’s 
birthday at a mosque in the Indonesian capital. An Indonesian of Chinese 
ethnicity, and a Christian, he joined devotees singing a religious song along 
with Muslim celebrants on stage.

 

 He asked the audience to pray for him because the following day he was due in 
court, charged with blaspheming Islam. “Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for 
your prayers,” he said 
https://nasional.tempo.co/read/news/2016/12/12/078827296/hadiri-perayaan-maulid-nabi-di-menteng-ahok-minta-maaf.

 

 The governor, widely known as Ahok, needs all the goodwill he can get. He is 
the highest-ranking Indonesian official to have ever been charged with 
insulting a religion in Indonesia. Many already fear that the trial will end in 
guilty verdict.

 


 


 



 
 Ahok, whose appointment to the Indonesian capital’s top job was opposed by 
hard-line Muslims, was accused of insulting Islam in a campaign speech on Sept. 
27. In the address, he said 
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/10/10/ahok-apologizes-to-muslims-for-alleged-defamation.html
 that religious conservatives who cited a Quranic verse in support of their 
position that non-Muslims should not hold high office were being duplicitous. 
He told a crowd: “Ladies and gentlemen, you don’t have to vote for me — because 
you’ve been lied to by those using [the Quran’s] Surah al-Maidah verse 51.” (An 
edited transcript and video of his speech that twisted his statement went viral 
and helped fan public anger.)
 In the past two months, the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) and other hard-line 
Muslim groups led three massive protests that paralyzed downtown Jakarta, 
demanding the governor be jailed and the ouster of President Joko “Jokowi” 
Widodo, whose party endorsed Ahok’s candidacy in the gubernatorial election. 
Jokowi attended prayers with the demonstrators on Dec. 2 — a move that helped 
defuse the political tension directed toward him but risked giving legitimacy 
to the anti-Ahok and anti-Chinese sentiments. “The Politics of Mobocracy,” read 
the cover of news magazine Tempo magazine last week, over an image of the rally.
 Although moderate Muslim leaders and scholars have maintained Ahok’s 
innocence, public opinion has started to turn against the once popular 
governor. In a survey released last week, 45% of respondents said Ahok had 
insulted Islam, though 88.5% said they didn’t know exactly what he said. “If 
they didn’t exactly know about Ahok’s statement, then they agreed there was a 
religious blasphemy or not, what was it based on?” was the question posed 
http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2016/12/08/17585931/survei.88.5.persen.masyarakat.tak.tahu.persis.ucapan.ahok.yang.dianggap.menista.agama
 by pollster Saiful Muljani in local media.
 Ahok’s trial is not the only religiously motivated legal challenge that is 
ongoing at Indonesia’s courts. This year, an Islamic pro-family group that 
calls itself the Family Love Alliance — it is also known by its Indonesian 
initials AILA — filed 
http://time.com/4458727/indonesia-democracy-lgbt-discrimination/?xid=homepage a 
judicial review to the Constitutional Court to criminalize gay sex and 
nonmarital sex. There are fears that, if it succeeds, it will open the path for 
more legal persecution of other minority groups.
 These two recent cases signal the growing intolerance toward ethnic, religious 
and sexual minorities in Indonesia — but the tug of war between Islamist and 
secular forces in the country has been going on for decades.
 Indonesia — which has the world’s biggest Muslim population, is a secular 
country with a separation between state and church, where minority groups are 
supposed to be treated equal before the law. The secular principle started when 
the founding fathers agreed to drop the inclusion of Shari‘a in the nation’s 
constitution — allegedly to accommodate the wishes of religious minorities, 
especially those in the eastern part of the sprawling, culturally diverse 
archipelago.
 However, the fear now is that Indonesia’s democracy is being hijacked by 
hard-line and ultraconservative groups. There are both jihadists, who dream of 
establishing an Islamic state in the country through violent means, and groups 
who seek to push an Islamist agenda through political and social channels.
 As a result, the aims of the constitution are being perverted. According to 
Indonesia’s criminal code, for example, homosexuality isn’t illegal. But at the 
Constitutional Court, a so-called expert witness for AILA argued 
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/08/24/mk-justices-want-casual-sex-outlawed.html
 that universal human rights weren’t applicable in Indonesia because the 
country was built on religious norms.
Anadolu Agency—Getty ImagesHundreds of thousands of Indonesian Muslims hold a 
peaceful protest against the Jakarta Governor who is accused of insulting 
Islam, in Jakarta, Indonesia on Dec. 2, 2016. The protesters demand the 
acceleration of legal proceedings against Governor Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja 
Purnama Meanwhile, in a sermon in front of President Jokowi and Cabinet 
ministers during the Dec. 2 rally, FPI leader Habib Rizieq Shihab said 
http://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20161202123715-20-176837/rizieq-shihab-ceramahi-jokowi/
 that “God’s law is above everything, that holy verses are above the 
constitution’s.”
 Jokowi recently announced that he would set up a task force to tackle the 
issue of intolerance. “Apart from Muslims, Indonesia is also home to 
Christians, Catholics, Hindus, Buddhists and Confucians,” Jokowi said 
http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-38246456 earlier in the Bali Democracy 
Forum last week. “The peace values are upheld by all religious adherents in 
Indonesia.”
 However, as a politician he has also sought help from religious leaders and 
has left hard-line groups like the FPI alone. Now, while maintaining a 
ostensibly neutral stance, Jokowi has effectively thrown Ahok under the bus, 
saying flatly http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-37906216: “I will not 
protect brother Basuki Tjahaja Purnama.”
 
 The Ahok trial — like the LGBT judicial review at the Constitutional Court — 
is a litmus test of Indonesia’s commitment to its principle as a secular, 
inclusive and tolerant country. So far, it is failing that test.
 

Kirim email ke