Under Article 37 of the Criminal Procedure Law (CPL), an individual can be held 
in a “police-designated” location for up to six months; police have to inform 
their family members of their detention within 24 hours, but they don’t have to 
tell them where prisoners are being held. RSDL takes the accused off the map: 
most people detained under this measure have no contact with the outside world 
and no access to legal representation. For six long months, their families have 
no idea where they are, what condition they are in, or even whether they are 
dead or alive. These conditions mean that torture is less likely to be 
investigated, and much more likely to occur in the first place.
...
Liu Xiaobo Wasn’t China’s Only Prisoner of Conscience


  
|  
|   
|   
|   |    |

   |

  |
|  
|   |  
Liu Xiaobo Wasn’t China’s Only Prisoner of Conscience
 By Benedict Rogers, The Diplomat The best way to honor his memory is to press 
China to end torture and free other dissidents.  |   |

  |

  |

 

The best way to honor his memory is to press China to end torture and free 
other dissidents.By Benedict RogersJuly 28, 2017       Two weeks ago Liu Xiaobo 
became only the second Nobel Peace Prize Laureate in history to die in custody. 
Other Nobel Laureates, such as Nelson Mandela and Aung San Suu Kyi, spent many 
years in detention, but the only other Laureate to die in state custody was 
Nazi opponent Carl von Ossietzky.Compounding the cruelty is the fact that Liu 
Xiaobo’s widow, Liu Xia, has been incommunicado since his death. It is believed 
she remains in detention. A regime that does not even have mercy on a grieving 
widow is one that is completely devoid of humanity.Liu’s death could have been 
prevented if proper medical treatment was provided at an earlier stage. The 
refusal to provide it constitutes torture. It is no exaggeration to say that 
the Chinese regime murdered Liu Xiaobo.Enjoying this article? Click here to 
subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.Liu Xiaobo’s death has shaken 
Chinese dissidents and international human rights advocates profoundly. It 
exposes the extent of the cruelty of a regime which jails and tortures 
prisoners of conscience without trial and uses torture and other violence with 
impunity. If the Chinese regime blatantly ignores appeals from the Nobel 
Committee and the international community, including the UN High Commissioner 
for Human Rights, and is prepared to see a Nobel Laureate die rather than 
receive proper medical care, what hope is there for dissidents and activists 
without such a high profile?Liu’s death, while a tragedy in itself, shines a 
spotlight on a far wider crisis for human rights in China. On July 9, 2015, an 
unprecedented crackdown on human rights lawyers and activists, and their 
relatives and colleagues, began, with over 300 being detained, interrogated or 
disappeared. While most have now been released, some on “bail” conditions 
amounting to house arrest, many speak of horrific physical and psychological 
torture.The United Nations has long highlighted China’s record of torture. In 
its fifth review of China’s implementation of the UN Convention Against Torture 
(CAT), ratified by China in 1988, the UN Committee Against Torture concluded 
that China has failed to implement previous recommendations. The committee 
highlighted the lack of legal safeguards to prevent torture, the harassment of 
lawyers, human rights defenders and petitioners, and accountability for abuses, 
particularly in Tibet.These grave concerns are illustrated by testimonies of 
former prisoners and their lawyers and family members.Wang Qiaoling, the wife 
of lawyer Li Heping, who was released in May after almost two years in 
detention, provides a harrowing testimony about her husband’s treatment: “He 
was forced to take medicine. They stuffed the pills into his mouth… After 
taking the pills he felt pain in his muscles and his vision was blurred… He was 
beaten. He endured grueling questioning while being denied sleep for days on 
end…” Wang told The Guardianthat: “He has changed completely, his appearance, 
his physical looks… [he is] so different from the husband I remember… I am 
pretty sure he was treated with great cruelty.”Li Chunfu, Li Heping’s brother, 
also a human rights lawyer, was released on “bail” on January 12, 2017. He was 
then swiftly hospitalized after it emerged that torture had left him physically 
frail and suffering from symptoms of schizophrenia.In a letter to world 
leaders, the families of detained lawyers said: “Prisoners were also put in 
cages submerged mostly in water, and left inside for seven days, the entire 
body underwater with a space to breath at the top. As they stood in the water 
and tried to sleep, rats would scurry about outside the cage, biting their nose 
and ears.”Of course, torture is not a new phenomenon in China, and certainly 
predates Xi Jinping. Prominent human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng has endured 
years of torture both before and during his prison sentence. Since 2004, he has 
been forcibly disappeared, arrested, imprisoned, and tortured on numerous 
occasions. Yet he has emphasized that he is just one of many suffering under 
the Communist Party regime.Under Xi Jinping, however, there has been an 
unprecedented crackdown on human rights defenders and the space for civil 
society. The use of “secret prisons” – essentially extra-legal detention 
facilities – and a measure called residential surveillance at a designated 
location (RSDL), create the perfect conditions for torture and 
ill-treatment.RSDL is not the same as house arrest. Under Article 37 of the 
Criminal Procedure Law (CPL), an individual can be held in a 
“police-designated” location for up to six months; police have to inform their 
family members of their detention within 24 hours, but they don’t have to tell 
them where prisoners are being held. RSDL takes the accused off the map: most 
people detained under this measure have no contact with the outside world and 
no access to legal representation. For six long months, their families have no 
idea where they are, what condition they are in, or even whether they are dead 
or alive. These conditions mean that torture is less likely to be investigated, 
and much more likely to occur in the first place.Frequent beatings, sleep 
deprivation, forced medication and prolonged isolation are the norm for 
prisoners of conscience in China – not only for the lawyers and activists 
detained in the last two years, but for the people they were trying to defend: 
practitioners of the banned Buddhist-inspired Falun Gong spiritual movement, 
unregistered Christians, Uyghur Muslims, Tibetans, and any perceived critic of 
the Communist Party of China. Shocking allegations of forcible removal of vital 
organs from prisoners of conscience, for sale for transplant, persist.Zhang 
Shaojie, a pastor from Henan, is barely alive after enduring various forms of 
torture. He was sentenced in 2014 to a 12-year term and according to his 
daughter, Esther Zhang Huixin, he is being intentionally starved of daylight, 
sleep and food. “They cruelly torture my father,” Esther said. “He’s unable to 
see the sun during the day. He’s deprived of sleep for 24 hours at a time. The 
prison gives him only one steamed bun a day and intentionally starves him. 
According to people who have been released from that prison, my father is 
barely alive, suffering both mentally and physically.”Yang Hua, another jailed 
Christian pastor, was described in March as “on the verge of paralysis” as a 
result of severe inflammation in his legs. Proper medical treatment has been 
denied, with only penicillin prescribed.In 2015, Tibetan monk Tenzin Delek 
Rinpoche died in a Chinese prison after 13 years in detention. Last year Memet 
Ibrahm, a Uyghur Muslim was jailed for watching an Islamic video on his mobile 
telephone, died in police custody. Uyghurs in Xinjiang describe a “police 
state” in which those who study abroad are rounded up upon return, often 
disappearing into detention.If a dissident or religious minority leader is not 
arrested, they are often disappeared. The whereabouts of Wenzhou’s Catholic 
Bishop Peter Shao Zhumin, for example, are unknown, prompting the Vatican to 
issue a statement of “grave concern.”Even beyond China’s shores, critics of the 
regime are not safe. In October 2015, Hong Kong-based bookseller Gui Minhai 
disappeared from his holiday home in Thailand. Four of his publishing 
colleagues – Lin Rongji, Lu Bo, Zhang Zhiping, and Lee Bo – disappeared at 
around the same time, but all returned to Hong Kong last year. Gui, however, 
remains incommunicado in detention in China.His daughter Angela Gui, who has 
spoken about his case at the United Nations, the U.S. Congress, and the British 
Parliament, says her father’s case is not about one man alone. “This is about 
China actively extending its control beyond its borders,” she argues. “This is 
about China kidnapping and illegally detaining more and more people because of 
their political beliefs. It’s about European citizens no longer being able to 
know that their human rights will be protected … In what has been called ‘the 
darkest moment’ for human rights in China in recent years we have to make sure 
that people like my father are not forgotten. Because to stay silent over what 
happened to him is to guarantee that it will happen again.”Democratic nations 
must unite to condemn China’s rampant use of torture. For too long there has 
been a tendency among the international community to kowtow to China. The 
mindset is that China’s economic power is too great, trade too important, and 
so human rights are sacrificed. Western leaders should listen to UN experts who 
said in a statement to mark the International Day for the Victims of Torture 
this year that the prohibition of torture is “absolute” and that torture can 
never be justified under any circumstances. “Torture destroys lives,” say the 
UN experts. “Any tolerance or acquiescence concerning such practices, however 
exceptional and well argued, will inevitably lead down a slippery slope towards 
complete arbitrariness and brute force, in disgrace for all of humanity.”The 
best way to honor Liu Xiaobo is to ensure that the values to which he dedicated 
– and ultimately sacrificed – his life live on. The international community – 
or at least those within it who believe in human rights and the rule of law – 
must draw a line with China. They must stand up and speak out with one voice, 
to tell Xi Jinping’s regime that if it wants to be respected on the world 
stage, it must stop torture. China must be told that with global leadership 
come particular responsibilities. Those include an end to arbitrary detention, 
forced disappearances and inhumane treatment of prisoners.Benedict Rogers is 
East Asia Team Leader at Christian Solidarity Worldwide, Deputy Chair of the 
Human Rights Commission, and author of the report “The Darkest Moment: The 
Crackdown on Human Rights in China 2013-2016.”

Kirim email ke