By Ted R. Bromund
Base college entry on credentials https://www.newsday.com/opinion/commentary/base-college-entry-on-credentials-1.20651429 University admissions should not be about social engineering, identity politics. A lawsuit against Harvard University has the potential to expose one of the ways colleges discriminate against the best and brightest. Photo Credit: Victor J. Blue Updated August 24, 2018 8:29 PM This month, millions of students will head to college. But some — including many Asian-Americans — won’t be going where they wanted to. A lawsuit against Harvard University has the potential to change that, and to expose one of the ways colleges discriminate against the best and brightest. The plaintiffs, Students for Fair Admissions, have produced evidence that, according to a study conducted by Harvard itself, Asian-Americans would make up 43 percent of the student body if admissions were based solely on academic merit. As it is, they are 19 percent. The Supreme Court ruled in 2003 that the “educational benefits that flow from an ethnically diverse student body” allow universities to use ethnicity as an admissions criterion. But the court has been clear that this is not a license to discriminate against groups. For its part, Harvard denies it discriminates — it merely seeks diversity. But diversity means picking and choosing in part on the basis of race — and picking one person partly by race means not picking another person partly by his or hers. Most Americans would see that as discrimination. And Harvard is accused of some ugly contortions to justify its admissions outcomes. Purportedly, it rated Asian-Americans lower on many virtues, including kindness and being “widely respected.” Imagine the liberal outrage if Harvard systematically ranked African-Americans as unkind to hold down their numbers. If the plaintiffs are right, that is what Harvard has done to Asian-Americans. But this isn’t about blaming Harvard. If Harvard was doing this, it’s a sure thing that most other elite colleges in the United States were doing it too. Nor are Asian-Americans the only victims of social engineering in college admissions. It is a fact that many, though not all, top colleges discriminate against women. This is a matter of math. Women constitute about 56 percent of all college applicants, yet many elite schools seek to maintain an even male-female ratio. Harvard, according to U.S. News & World Report, is 53 percent male. The odds of this happening by chance are zero. And it isn’t chance. In 2006, Jennifer Delahunty Britz, the dean of admissions at Kenyon College in Ohio, wrote in The New York Times that “because young men are rarer, they’re more valued applicants.” In other words, women are discriminated against.
