Sosialisme dengan ciri tkk itu pada dasarnya ya kapitalisme, sistem ekonomi 
yang diterapkan sudah sukar dibedakan lagi antara Tiongkok dan USA.  

 Bahkan dalam beberapa hal tertentu USA lebih sosialis, seperti misalnya 
keluarga yang pindah daerah ataupun negara bagian langsung saja bisa 
menyekolahkan anak2nya di public school yang tentu saja gratis. Sedang di 
Tiongkok tidak bisa, keluarga itu harus menunggu sesedikitnya 5 tahun lebih 
dahulu dan masih harus memenuhi tetek bengek tertentu setelah punya kartu 
penduduk baru anaknya bisa sekolah di public school.  

---In [email protected], <jetaimemucho1@...> wrote :

 Wow, pasti para pendukung "Sosialisme dengan ciri Tkk" bangga sekali dengan 
keberhasilan negara pujaannya dalam menciptakan orang super kaya....Bayangkan 
ada diranking dua , hanya dibawah AS!!!! Tapi harga yang harus dibayar rakyat 
Tkk untuk melahirkan kaum super kaya itu sungguh sangat sangat tinggi. Katanya 
negara sosialis, menjunjung Marxisme dan Fik. Mao Tsedong, tapi  mahasiswa yang 
ingin  menerapkan ajaran Mao justru diintimidasi, ditangkap dan dipenjara, dan 
kemungkinan "dihilangkan". Aneh bin ajaib: Mahasiswa yang concern dengan nasib 
buruh dan ketidak adilan, malah dikejar-kejar!! Kaum penguasa 
revisionis-kapitalis-sosial imperailis Tiongkok takut banget sama 
mahasiswa-mahasiswa seperti Yue Xin ini!!! Makanya seperti pepatah bilang "to 
nip it in the bud", mereka ingin menghancurkan bibit-bibit ini sebelum bisa 
berkembang biak dan menjadi besar.... Tapi sudah tentu kaum revisionis dan 
semua pengkhianat sosialisme lupa sejarah, lupa bahwa pembebasan Tiongkok juga 
dimulai oleh sekelompok kecil orang-orang Marxis sejati seperti Mao, dari tidak 
ada menjadi ada, dari kecil menjadi besar, tak perduli berapa kali mereka 
dipukul dan dibunuhi, akhirnya menang. Itulah logika orang revolusioner.... 
Jadi pengorbanan para aktivis Marxis sekarang pasti tidak akan sia-sia!!!!Kaum 
buruh dan rakyat Tiongkok akan menemukan jalannya guna melaksanakan misi 
sejarahnya!!!!
 

 

 

  
 Fears for young Marxist activist missing after police raid in China
  
 A young rights activist who called for China’s top university to be 
transparent about its investigation of a rape case and joined a labour dispute 
in Shenzhen has not been seen for more than six weeks after she was detained by 
police.
 Yue Xin, 22, was taken into custody on August 24 along with about 50 other 
activists, many of them young Marxists, who were involved in a labour rights 
protest in Shenzhen.
 She had earlier accused Peking University of trying to silence her for 
demanding information about the handling of a sexual misconduct case that led 
to a student’s suicide 20 years ago – one of China’s most discussed #MeToo 
incidents.
 The detentions were part of an intensifying clampdown by the authorities on a 
growing number of young Chinese activists who have found inspiration in Marxism 
in recent years, hoping to bring change on issues ranging from feminism and 
income equality to workers’ rights.
 But in sharp contrast to the official Marxist line, this new generation of 
Marxists emphasises individual freedoms, with some even showing interest in a 
Western constitutional democracy – a stand the country’s mainstream Marxists 
and Maoists usually dismiss as the wrong path for China.
 Why Beijing isn’t Marxist enough for China’s radical millennials
 Most of the protesters detained in August have since been released, but four 
have been placed under “residential surveillance at a designated location” – a 
form of secret detention – while four others are still in custody and could 
face prosecution, according to their friends and other activists.
 But the whereabouts of Yue, as well as her mother, who has been out of contact 
since early September, remain unknown.
  
 “Yue might not reappear for a long time,” said a student activist speaking on 
condition of anonymity, adding that she wanted to raise awareness of Yue’s 
plight.
 The young activist graduated from Peking University’s School of Foreign 
Languages this summer. In April, as the #MeToo movement gained traction on 
Chinese campuses and in workplaces, she filed a formal request to the college 
demanding that it disclose information about its handling of a sexual 
misconduct case involving a professor that resulted in the suicide of a student 
two decades ago. 
 Yue then wrote an open letter accusing the college of trying to muzzle her by 
pressuring her family and suggesting she might not be allowed to graduate, 
leading to a public backlash against the university on social media.
 In July, Yue turned her focus to a labour dispute at Shenzhen-based Jasic 
Technology. Leftist university student activists, including Yue, travelled from 
other parts of the country to back the workers in Guangdong in their campaign 
for union rights at the factory, which makes electronic welding machines and 
robotic arms. 
 But on August 24, police in riot gear raided the flat where they were staying 
in Huizhou, near Shenzhen, and detained the group, according to activists.
  
 Earlier that month, Yue had told the South China Morning Post she wanted to 
support the workers in Shenzhen, even if it meant being arrested.
 “More than 30 innocent workers have been locked up already and treated 
inhumanely. I cannot just sit back and be OK with just voicing my support 
online – I have to go to the front line,” Yue said. “I’m prepared to be 
arrested … but it’s not about being arrested or not … it’s about believing that 
what you are doing is about justice, then you will have no fear.”
 Chinese Maoists join students in fight for workers’ rights at Jasic Technology 
 There are also concerns for Yue’s mother. NGOCN, a social development 
non-profit based in Guangzhou which Yue had applied to join after graduation, 
said Yue’s mother had contacted them a week after the Huizhou raid, trying to 
find out what had happened to her daughter.
 Executive director Wu Lilan said they told Yue’s mother they had not been in 
touch with Yue since June, but they would try to help
 “Yue Xin kept in contact with her mother after she came to Guangdong, but her 
mother was anxious when she hadn’t heard from her for four or five days,” Wu 
said. But Wu said the NGO had been unable to contact Yue’s mother, who lives in 
Beijing, since September 2. The Post has also tried to contact Yue’s mother but 
her phone remains switched off.
 An officer at Yanziling police station in Shenzhen said they were not handling 
Yue’s case and directed inquiries to the Pingshan district government office, 
which could not be reached for comment.
 Apart from Yue, four editors of Epoch Pioneer, a leftist website focusing on 
labour activism, have been placed under “residential surveillance at a 
designated location” in Guangzhou, according to activists from the Jasic worker 
support group. 
 They said four workers were also being held in the Shenzhen Second Detention 
Centre, accused of “gathering a crowd to disturb social order”, with limited 
access to lawyers.
 Other young activists from the group have been released, but are being closely 
watched by their universities and parents, according to the activists.
 Would Karl Marx recognise China’s new communism?
 While classes on Marxism are routinely part of the curriculum at universities 
in China, the growing number of young leftist activists on campuses has 
apparently got college authorities worried.
  
 Since the new academic year began in September, young Marxists have come up 
against tighter controls at their universities. 
 One of them, a student at the School of Economics at Renmin University of 
China in Beijing, detailed how he was “blacklisted for caring about the grass 
roots” in an article posted online that was later removed by censors. 
 Xiang Junwei accused faculty administrators had put him and his family under 
pressure, with a lecturer telling his parents he needed to correct his 
“dangerous thoughts” and was in a “politically problematic” position. He said 
he had been excluded from a university online chat group and claimed the 
faculty had targeted 12 other young Marxists for similar treatment.
 In a separate article, he outlined the case of another female student at the 
school, who he said had been treated in hospital after she went on hunger 
strike to protest against her family and a lecturer trying to stop her from 
getting involved in the labour rights campaign in Shenzhen. 
 He called on the university to allow her to return to her studies without 
having to sign a statement saying she would abandon her activism – a statement 
he said it insisted she sign if she wanted to go back to class.
  
 Renmin University’s School of Economics could not be reached for comment.
 A new class struggle: Chinese party members get back to Communist Manifesto 
basics
 Marxist student societies have also said they had trouble renewing their 
registrations at top colleges including Renmin University, Nanjing University 
and the University of Science and Technology Beijing. 
 At Peking University, where Yue studied, the Marxism society had to find a 
faculty adviser from the School of Marxism to support its application to 
re-register after the campus Communist Youth League chapter withdrew its 
backing.
 
 Speaking in early August, Yue said students were following a tradition at the 
university of getting involved in grass-roots activism and labour rights. 
“Student activists have been fighting on a wide range of issues – including 
against sexual harassment and in support of democracy on campus … not everyone 
in this movement would identify as Marxist, Leninist or Maoist but they are 
certainly all influenced by Marxism,” she said.
 


 On Sunday, October 14, 2018 6:14 PM, "jonathangoeij@... [GELORA45]" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

 

   
 

 Dengan mengkaji data miliarder dari 23 negara pada periode 1987-2002, mereka 
menemukan bahwa ketika miliarder menjadi kaya karena koneksi politik, hal ini 
cenderung menciptakan "pengaruh turunan" terhadap ekonomi - kekayaan dan 
kekuasaan terpusat pada sejumlah orang tertentu dapat menyebabkan pengaruh 
lebih besar terhadap kebijakan pemerintah, sehingga mengesampingkan kepentingan 
yang lebih luas.

 ...
 Inilah 20 kota yang memiliki orang super kaya paling banyak 
https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah-45804375 Fernado DuarteBBC
 
 14 Oktober 2018
 

 Hak atas fotoGETTY IMAGESImage captionPada tahun 2017, jumlah miliarder di 
Hong Kong bertambah lebih 20 orang. Jika Anda tinggal di Hong Kong, Anda 
kemungkinan sudah mengetahui Li Ka-shing.
 Pengusaha berumur 90 tahun ini adalah orang terkaya urutan ke-23 dunia, dengan 
nilai kekayaan bersih diperkirakan sebesar US$37,7 miliar atau Rp572,8 triliun.
 Kekayaan Ka-shing mulai dari perhubungan, layanan keuangan sampai ke 
perusahaan energi.
 Tetapi miliarder ini hanyalah secuil dari kekayaan yang ada di wilayah otonomi 
Cina itu. Menurut edisi terbaru World Ultra Wealth Report, sensus tahunan yang 
diterbitkan perusahaan konsultan keuangan Wealth X, Hong Kong sekarang memiliki 
miliarder yang lebih banyak dari kota manapun, kecuali New York.
 Daerah ini adalah tempat tinggal 93 miliarder, lebih banyak 21 orang 
dibandingkan tahun 2016.
 Jack Ma, salah satu orang terkaya Cina itu, mundur dari Alibaba 
https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-45457384 Daftar bintang termahal Forbes 
ungkap kesenjangan upah gender di industri film 
https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/gnb-41020501 Kekayaannya tembus Rp2.150 triliun, 
bos raksasa toko online jadi orang terkaya sedunia 
https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/majalah-44867549 Sensus tersebut juga menemukan 
setengah dari 10 kota dengan penduduk miliarder terbanyak dunia berada di 
negara-negara berkembang, tempat di mana tercatat ketidakseimbangan masyarakat 
terbesar di dunia.
 Munculnya "miliarder baru" juga sangat mempengaruhi peningkatan jumlah 
kekayaan super di bumi: sensus mencatat jumlah tertinggi, 2.754 orang dengan 
kekayaan US$1 miliar/Rp15,1 triliun atau lebih dari tahun 2017.
 Kekayaan keseluruhan mereka mencapai US$9,2 triliun atau Rp139,8 ribu triliun, 
lebih dari PDB keseluruhan Jerman dan Jepang.
 Kota-kota dengan penduduk miliarder terbanyak (Sumber: Wealth-X) Kota Jumlah 
miliarder di tahun 2017 Perubahan sejak 2016 1. New York 103 +1 2. Hong Kong 93 
+21 3. San Francisco 74 +14 4. Moskow 69 -2 5. London 62 0 6. Beijing 57 +19 7. 
Singapura 44 +7 8. Dubai 40 +3 9. Mumbai 39 +10 9. Shenzen (Cina) 39 +16 11. 
Los Angeles 38 +6 12. Istanbul 36 +8 13. Sao Paulo 33 +4 14. Hangzhou (Cina) 32 
+11 15. Tokyo 30 +8 16. Paris 29 0 17. Riyadh 26 +2 18. Jeddah 23 +1 19. 
Shanghai 23 +3 20. Mexico City 21 +2 10 negara miliarder terbanyak (Sumber: 
Wealth-X) Negara Jumlah miliarder Perubahan (%) 2016-17 Kekayaan keseluruhan 
(miliar US$) Amerika Serikat 680 9.7% 3,167 Cina 338 35.7% 1,080 Jerman 152 
17.8% 466 India 104

















Kirim email ke