Andrew Yang banks upstart campaign on $1,000 proposition 
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/456011-andrew-yang-banks-upstart-campaign-on-1000-proposition
 

 BY RACHEL FRAZIN https://thehill.com/author/rachel-frazin AND CHRIS MILLS 
RODRIGO https://thehill.com/author/chris-mills-rodrigo - 08/03/19 05:01 PM EDT

 

 

 
 Tech entrepreneur Andrew Yang https://thehill.com/people/andrew-yang is 
banking his 2020 presidential campaign on an experimental idea: a $1,000 a 
month "Freedom Dividend" for every American adult, no questions asked.
 The policy, a form of Universal Basic Income (UBI), is seen by proponents as a 
solution to income inequality. The idea has helped him attract a loyal 
following known as the "Yang Gang" and given the little known tech entrepreneur 
an unexpectedly high profile role in the crowded Democratic race.
 But Yang is facing skepticism from strategists about whether he can turn UBI 
into a winning idea in light of polls showing the idea is broadly unpopular. 
Some critics believe the policy is an example of socialism run amok while 
others prefer a more targeted approach to combating income inequality.
 
 Democratic strategist Eddie Vale said Yang’s Freedom Dividend mostly just 
appeals to the “Silicon Valley tech bro.”
 “It is a very Silicon Valley solution,” he said. “Many things in life are a 
lot more complicated… and you can’t just think of one idea that’s going to 
magically solve everything.”
 Vale added that the Freedom Dividend also lacks emotional resonance, largely 
because he says it has not been incorporated as part of a “bigger policy 
platform.”
 “Most of the candidates are incorporating their policies into the themes of 
their campaigns,” Vale said, adding that UBI is “this one technical solution … 
and it doesn’t really have any theme or emotion or vision behind it. That is 
what you more normally center a campaign around.” 
 The Yang campaign, however, believes it can win over skeptics by providing 
universal basic income the full spotlight of a 2020 presidential campaign. Yang 
himself mentioned the Freedom Dividend in his opening and closing statements 
during the second Democratic presidential debate earlier this week.
 The proposal is simple: If elected, the Yang administration would give $1,000 
a month to every U.S. citizen 18 years or older with “no strings attached,” a 
policy the campaign describes as one “on which a stable, prosperous, and just 
society can be built.”
 Yang, who earlier led a standardized test prep company, sees the Freedom 
Dividend as a solution to the “unprecedented crisis” that will be sparked by 
increased automation and new technologies, which he believes could leave as 
many as one out of three Americans out of a job in the next 12 years.
 During the debate this week, Yang promoted 
https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/1157049495961706497 the Freedom Dividend 
as helping women as well as minorities, noting that it was “the most effective 
way for us to address racial inequality in a genuine way and give every 
American a chance at the 21st century economy.” 
 Giving out a Freedom Dividend would cost more than $3 trillion a year based on 
the estimate of U.S. adults in the census.
 The Yang campaign proposes to pay for it through a value added tax (VAT) aimed 
at major corporations that it says could raise $800 billion in new revenue, 
though it did not provide a specific time frame. 
 It would also reduce benefits provided by “welfare programs, food stamps, 
disability and the like” to help offset the cost of the Freedom Dividend, 
though the campaign has said Yang would protect entitlement benefits like 
Social Security.
 That has left the program’s actual cost, after factoring in revenue and 
benefit offsets, uncertain, leaving it potentially vulnerable to attack.
 “Republicans will probably be pretty hostile to it,” said Vale. “They’re going 
to come at it with their same attacks that they do on any safety net programs.” 
 UBI has also failed to gain much traction in the 2020 race, even though Yang 
himself has remained remarkably competitive in a crowded Democratic primary.
 Yang also founded “Venture for America,” a non-profit that prepares younger 
professionals for work in start-ups. He has campaigned as an outsider who 
eschews ties at debates and who described himself at the debate as “the 
opposite of Donald Trump https://thehill.com/people/donald-trump” because he 
“is an Asian man who likes math.”
 Yang is only one poll short of qualifying for the fall debates under much more 
stringent criteria. Only eight other Democrats, including former Vice President 
Joe Biden https://thehill.com/people/joe-biden and Sens. Elizabeth Warren 
https://thehill.com/people/elizabeth-warren (D-Mass.) and Bernie Sanders 
https://thehill.com/people/bernie-sanders (I-Vt.), have made the debate stage 
in a crowded race of about two dozen candidates.
 Yang’s opponents in the 2020 race have said they don’t support a UBI.
 Warren, for example, has argued 
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-what-2020-democratic-candidates-for-president-have-said-about-universal-basic-income-2019-07-09
 other policies such as lowering student debt, improving housing availability 
or investing in universal child care and education were better ways to reduce 
income inequality. 
 Meanwhile, Sanders, when asked about UBI at a town hall, responded by saying 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79op8giO3wY&feature=youtu.be, “Nah, I got a 
better idea,” while mentioning policies he supports like creating jobs through 
investment in sustainable technology. 
 The idea has also failed to gain much traction so far. A recent NPR/PBS 
NewsHour/Marist survey found just 26 percent of U.S. adults described UBI as a 
“good idea” while 66 percent called it a “bad idea.” 
 Across those identified with a political party, the idea was also unpopular, 
especially among Republicans: only 42 percent of Democrats liked the idea, 
while just 8 percent of those identifying with the GOP supported it. 
 
 Yang campaign spokesman Randy Jones acknowledged UBI has not polled well, but 
he attributed it largely to a lack of understanding about the program.
 “If you polled the American people and asked them if they thought $1,000 a 
month in their pocket would be helpful, it would be overwhelmingly, yes,” he 
told The Hill. “When you break this issue down for the average American and 
explain it in a better way, the majority of people would be on board.”
 Examples of true unconditional UBI programs are hard to find, but analyses of 
comparable cash transfers in developing countries conducted on a smaller scale 
have generally found minimal effects on unemployment as well as some positive 
economic benefits.
 The closest point of comparison in the United States is the Alaska Permanent 
Fund, a state-held wealth fund which disburses roughly $1,000 to $2,000 to 
every resident of the state yearly -- much smaller than the program envisioned 
by Yang.
 Two researchers, Ioana Marinescu from the University of Pennsylvania and Damon 
Jones from the University of Chicago, analyzed the dividend since its creation 
in 1982 and found it did not negatively affect employment rates or propensity 
to work in comparison to similar states.
 Nonetheless the Yang campaign believes it has a winning issue in UBI. Yang 
tweets about the policy frequently as he looks to introduce the policy to more 
Americans. 
 “I know this may sound like a gimmick, but this is a deeply American idea,” 
Yang said at the debate.
 “The automation of our jobs is the essential challenge facing us today. It is 
the reason why Donald Trump is president today and any politician who’s not 
addressing it is failing the American people.”





Kirim email ke