-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-02-14 12:06, cyrille henry wrote: > > hello > > Le 14/02/2011 09:30, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > >>> some of my patch are more than 2 times slower... >> >> darn. > does that mean "this is a huge problem, i put it on top of my priority". > or "oups, we're doomed" > ?
i'm not sure yet. it's not on TOP of my priority list, but it is something i need to evaluate and probably come up with a better solution. the architectural change was done in order to make the render-chain more modular, so 3rd party objects could be used with various Gem releases without the need to re-compile. right now, i think that only pix_ objects should be affected by the slow-down; is this correct? fgmasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1ZErgACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQQcACg6crTWOK11Cb5wxNwfWuJ+3sU 5X4AoI52WpEiMXvLDQ1Z6KugTC6a9NeZ =Qinr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
