It is strange to see the object [pix_blabla] created and get in the console : error: GemException: couldn't find 'blabla'.'' And a 'help' on this object and i get : sorry, couldn't find help patch for "pix_freeframe.pd" ++
Jack Le lundi 14 février 2011 à 12:36 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2011-02-14 12:06, cyrille henry wrote: > > > > > > is it normal that every pix_blablabla object get instancied as a > > pix_freeframe object? > > yes this is normal. > FreeFrame (and frei0r) also register loaders, so you can instantiate > these effects as [pix_<pluginname>]. > > > (with a "error: GemException: couldn't find 'blablabla'.''") > > could be that i increased verbosity with one of the last commits, so you > actually notice that freeframe is involved (as opposed to the object > simply failing to create) > > just to make sure: freeframe/frei0r loaders should only take effect if > there is actually such a plugin. > e.g. if you create [pix_blabla] and there is no FreeFrame plugin named > "blabla" but there is an abstraction pix_blabla.pd in your path, you > should still end up with the abstraction. > > fg > asdrm > IOhannes > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk1ZE8QACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRjAQCgnI6g9PAF1BO8bOyImNY0zAgD > v7gAoMlGvxC6mL6WXYhQGrW1lxvxuRTq > =etwb > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > GEM-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
