> My guess (and assumption) is that the *res update in AtomicSimpleCPU is just > due to a different code factorization, or could be moved into writeBytes(), > to make all the templates identical. Then they could be factored out of the > CPU models. If I'm wrong, then you're right, but I'm not convinced I'm > wrong...
I'm not objecting to this. I this really what this patch is all about though? Nate _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
