Yes, please.
Gabe
Quoting Ali Saidi <[email protected]>:
We can debate the fix whenever, but at the moment the issue remains
that the head of the tree is broken. If it's a simple fix, then
please fix and lets be done with it, but if it's going to take any
time please undo your changes so that the tree can be working again.
Thanks,
Ali
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 16:12:49 -0400, Korey Sewell <[email protected]> wrote:
Nope,
I was going to put O3 back to the old way and then the workaround in
inorder.
This problem all centers around marking the hwrei instruction w/the
isControl flag.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 3:38 PM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote:
I don't want to make this more complicated than necessary, but did you
figure out why flagging hwrei as "isControl" breaks O3?
Nope, I just never got the sit-down time to figure out this solution so I
was going to temporarily "unControl" hwrei so the other people could work
until I get the bandwidth to fix this the "right way" (or at the very
least
a convoluted way)
I'm barely following the thread, but just to confirm, your going to
put the workaround into O3, right? If O3 is "broken" I think the
workaround should be in O3. It seems wrong to me to do the dynamic
thing in inorder if it is correct.
Nate
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
