Gotta agree with Ali :). On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Ali Saidi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:26:37 -0700, nathan binkert <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey, just to throw this out there, what do people think of having a >>> menuconfig like interface to configure a build? It would be a little >>> easier to work with and a little easier to discover what options there >>> are. I'm thinking maybe you pass in --configure and it does the same >>> thing as the help, except instead of printing all the options it lets >>> you modify them and stores the results. I don't think using the real >>> menuconfig would work, but it probably (knock on wood) wouldn't be too >>> hard to come up with a reasonable approximation using the python >>> bindings for ncurses. I've been meaning to look into how feasible this >>> is on the scons side, but I haven't found the time. It may be completely >>> impossible. >>> >> >> Sounds interesting. Do people really screw around with options much >> though? I think it would be a fun little project, I just don't know >> how many people would use it. I fear that this might encourage more >> compile time options and we certainly don't want that. :) >> >> Nate >> > I think if we're going to spend some time on a infrastructure project > tending to the regression issues would be higher value. > > Ali > > > ______________________________**_________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/**listinfo/gem5-dev<http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev> > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
