----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/498/#review1448 -----------------------------------------------------------
configs/common/SysPaths.py <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/498/#comment1868> You still work for UofM? configs/common/SysPaths.py <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/498/#comment1870> Does this default make any more sense than the prior ones? OTOH, I don't know that any universal default makes sense; I guess this is as good as any. configs/common/SysPaths.py <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/498/#comment1869> I'm OK with getting rid of these defaults, but we need to make sure that the scripts on zizzer get edited so that the regressions there still run correctly. - Steve On 2011-02-23 02:21:34, Gabe Black wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/498/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-02-23 02:21:34) > > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > > > Summary > ------- > > Paths: Clean up how paths are processed in M5. > > Replace the default M5 path. Also adjust SysPaths.py to hide pieces that > aren't meant to be shared, do most of the work on import, and rework the > structure a little. > > > Diffs > ----- > > configs/common/SysPaths.py 8fe2d7ff1111 > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/498/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Gabe > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
