That's great. Yes, please use "Konstantinos Aisopos"

-Kostas

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Gabriel Michael Black
<[email protected]> wrote:
> You do, but someone can take care of it for you. Maybe Brad? You're name
> will be on the commit but one of us will actual push it up. Let us know if
> you want your name to be something other than what you've been using for
> email/reviews.
>
> Gabe
>
> Quoting Konstantinos Aisopos <[email protected]>:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> I got the green signal to submit my patch (GARNET: adding a fault model
>> for
>> resilient on-chip network research) and I was wondering if I need any
>> permissions to push it to the main repo.
>>
>> thanks,
>> -Kostas
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Brad Beckmann <[email protected]>
>> Date: Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:42 PM
>> Subject: Re: Review Request: GARNET: adding a fault model for resilient
>> on-chip network research.
>> To: Ali Saidi <[email protected]>, Gabe Black <[email protected]>,
>> Nathan
>> Binkert <[email protected]>, Steve Reinhardt <[email protected]>, Brad
>> Beckmann <[email protected]>, Tushar Krishna <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Konstantinos Aisopos <[email protected]>, Default <
>> [email protected]>
>>
>>
>>   This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
>> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/776/
>>
>> Ship it!
>>
>> Thanks for you hard work.  This looks good to me.
>>
>>
>> - Brad
>>
>> On August 18th, 2011, 2:58 p.m., Konstantinos Aisopos wrote:
>>  Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt,
>> Nathan
>> Binkert, Brad Beckmann, and Tushar Krishna.
>> By Konstantinos Aisopos.
>>
>> *Updated 2011-08-18 14:58:55*
>> Description
>>
>> GARNET: adding a fault model for resilient on-chip network research.
>>
>> This patch adds a fault model, which provides the probability of a number
>> of
>> architectural faults in the interconnection network (e.g., data
>> corruption,
>> misrouting). These probabilities can be used to realistically inject
>> faults
>> in GARNET and faithfully evaluate the effectiveness of novel resilient NoC
>> architectures.
>>
>>  Diffs
>>
>>   - configs/ruby/Ruby.py (889818c58eff)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/fault_model/FaultModel.hh (PRE-CREATION)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/fault_model/FaultModel.cc (PRE-CREATION)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/fault_model/FaultModel.py (PRE-CREATION)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/fault_model/SConscript (PRE-CREATION)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/BaseGarnetNetwork.hh (889818c58eff)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/BaseGarnetNetwork.cc (889818c58eff)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/BaseGarnetNetwork.py (889818c58eff)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/GarnetNetwork_d.hh
>>   (889818c58eff)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/GarnetNetwork_d.cc
>>   (889818c58eff)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/Router_d.hh (889818c58eff)
>>   - src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/Router_d.cc (889818c58eff)
>>
>> View Diff <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/776/diff/>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gem5-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to