> On 2012-01-04 20:01:48, Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> > I'm confused.  Do they assert when they're enabled?
> 
> Ali Saidi wrote:
>     Yes. These things have been in there forever and I think I'm the third 
> person to say that the assert must be wrong because we constantly run with 
> opt/fast with these asserts removed without issue.

Makes sense now.  Looks good to me.  I'd click "ship it" if you could do that 
inside a nested comment.


- Steve


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/931/#review1835
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2011-12-16 13:35:44, Ali Saidi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/931/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2011-12-16 13:35:44)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> O3: Remove some asserts that no longer seem to be valid.
> 
> We've been running with these removed for (and they're not actually present 
> in opt/fast) for months now. I'm convinced this assert is no longer valid.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/o3/decode_impl.hh ca98021c3f96 
>   src/cpu/o3/rename_impl.hh ca98021c3f96 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/931/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ali
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to