On 02.03.2012 15:55, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Steve Reinhardt wrote: > >> No, there is no common place. This relates to a comment I made on a different thread just a day or two ago, which is that we should restructure the regressions to use the code in configs/common so that there's only one copy of most of this kind of code, and so that it gets tested by the regressions. The best thing would be to restructure the current configuration files so that all the code needed to create a running systems are in the common directory and fs.py is just a wrapper that stitches a few things together based on some options. Similarly then the regression configuration files could stitch together configurations based on some internal options. Currently the bits necessary to create a working configuration are scattered among the examples and the common files. Thanks, Ali _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
