> On March 9, 2012, 11:36 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> > So did these files get changed to remove the warning?  Or are there 
> > warnings with other versions of gcc?  I'm curious about the history here... 
> > it seems a little dangerous to take these off unless we know that the 
> > reasons for having them there have been addresses.

There are no warnings with any version of gcc >= 4.2 at least. That's all I've 
been able to test. 

Was a -Wno-<insert warning here> flag added at some point perhaps? I cannot 
imagine that any older version of gcc would have problems when the more recent 
ones don't. Plus, if they do, then let's fix the code rather than disable 
-Werror. Agreed?


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1082/#review2293
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 6, 2012, 9:18 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1082/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 6, 2012, 9:18 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Scons: Remove Werror=False in SConscript files
> 
> This patch removes the overriding of "-Werror" in a handful of
> cases. The code compiles with gcc 4.6.3 and clang 3.0 without any
> warnings, and thus without any errors. There are no functional changes
> introduced by this patch. In the future, rather than ypassing
> "-Werror", address the warnings.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/testers/networktest/SConscript b5d80698c948 
>   src/mem/ruby/common/SConscript b5d80698c948 
>   src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/SConscript b5d80698c948 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1082/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> util/regress all passing (disregarding t1000 and eio)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to