> On March 21, 2012, 10:31 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote: > > AFAIK no one ever used this code anyway... people should speak up now if > > that's not the case.
Last chance to speak up :) - Andreas ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1110/#review2359 ----------------------------------------------------------- On March 21, 2012, 10:05 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1110/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 21, 2012, 10:05 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Description > ------- > > MEM: Remove legacy DRAM in preparation for memory updates > > This patch removes the DRAM memory class in preparation for updates to > the memory system, with the first one introducing an abstract memory > class, and removing the assumption of a single physical memory. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/PhysicalMemory.py c739a3a829f5 > src/mem/SConscript c739a3a829f5 > src/mem/dram.hh c739a3a829f5 > src/mem/dram.cc c739a3a829f5 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1110/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > util/regress all passing (disregarding t1000 and eio) > > > Thanks, > > Andreas Hansson > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
