-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1158/#review2599
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Steve Reinhardt


On April 18, 2012, 9:53 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1158/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 18, 2012, 9:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> clang/gcc: Use STL hash function for int64_t and uint64_t
> 
> This patch changes the guards for the definition of hash functions to
> also exclude the int64_t and uint64_t hash functions in the case we
> are using the c++0x STL <unordered_map> (and <hash>) or the TR1
> version of the same header. Previously the guard only covered the hash
> function for strings, but it seems there is also no need to define a
> hash for the 64-bit integer types, and this has caused problems with
> builds on 32-bit Ubuntu.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/base/hashmap.hh bbceb6297329 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1158/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compiled and ran with gcc 4.3, 4.6 and clang 2.9
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to