> I've run with fast alloc, without fast alloc and without fast alloc > but with tcmalloc (http://code.google.com/p/gperftools/). I've run each > twice and the results are reasonable conclusive. FastAlloc appears to be > slightly faster (1-2%) after increasing the max size to 1024 bytes and > adding FastAlloc to a few more classes in the O3 CPU. TCMalloc is an > astonishingly 8%-10% faster, so I vote for TCMalloc.
Would we put it in ext or add it as a dependency? Nate _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
