It's very strange... the test passes on my local machine, but running it on zizzer (both the regression run and a run I did independently) gives this small stats difference:
sim_insts 138165779 138165778 -1 -0.00% sim_ops 265203823 265203814 -9 -0.00% sim_ticks 5191766314000 5191766314000 0 +0.00% system.cpu.committedInsts 138165779 138165778 -1 -0.00% system.cpu.committedOps 265203823 265203814 -9 -0.00% I ran with both of the gcc versions on zizzer (4.4.5 and 4.5.2) and got the same result. My machine (where the test passed) has gcc 4.4.3, Any ideas? Steve On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Nilay Vaish <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2012, Cron Daemon wrote: > > ***** build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/**se/20.eio-short/alpha/eio/**simple-atomic >> FAILED! >> ***** build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/**se/30.eio-mp/alpha/eio/simple-**atomic-mp >> FAILED! >> ***** build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/**se/20.eio-short/alpha/eio/**simple-timing >> FAILED! >> ***** build/ALPHA/tests/opt/quick/**se/30.eio-mp/alpha/eio/simple-**timing-mp >> FAILED! >> ***** >> build/X86/tests/opt/quick/fs/**10.linux-boot/x86/linux/pc-**simple-timing >> FAILED! >> scons: `build/ALPHA_MOESI_hammer/**tests/opt/quick/fs' is up to date. >> scons: *** Error 1 >> scons: *** Error 1 >> scons: *** Error 1 >> scons: *** Error 1 >> > > Can some one checkout the error that occurred in X86 pc-simple-timing? > > -- > Nilay > > ______________________________**_________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/**listinfo/gem5-dev<http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev> > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
