On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Andreas Hansson <andreas.hans...@arm.com>wrote:
> > > > On July 18, 2012, 8:26 a.m., Nathan Binkert wrote: > > > I love the idea of this, but I still think that this does not belong > in MemObject. I think that we should really have a ClockedObject class > that derives from SimObject and that MemObject should derive from that. > There are a number of things that use a clock that aren't necessarily > MemObjects that could be moved over to the ClockedObject. Also, I have a > bunch of random event queue diffs that you might be interested in. Let me > know if you want me to send them your way. > > I'm happy to add another level in the class hierarchy. It would also match > closer with a future use where a ClockedObject could be e.g. wrapping a few > cores and caches and merely be a level in the hierarchy. > > Any objections to ClockedObject? If not I'll get to it... > Sounds good to me! Steve _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
