-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1319/#review3205
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


also seems like an improvement.. a little bit of documentaiton would be great. 
You can put a string after the function definition. E.g.:
def foo()
''' description on foo....

'''

would be great if you could do that for the functions you changed. 

- Ali Saidi


On July 24, 2012, 8:05 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1319/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 24, 2012, 8:05 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9130:79148c86d9a5
> ---------------------------
> Config: change how cpu class is set
> This changes the way in which the cpu class while restoring from a
> checkpoint is set. Earlier it was assumed if cpu type with which
> to restore is not same as the cpu type with the which to run the
> simulation, then the checkpoint should be restored with the atomic
> cpu. This assumption is being dropped. The checkpoint can now be
> restored with any cpu type, the default being atomic cpu.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/common/Simulation.py b57966a6c512 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1319/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nilay Vaish
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to