> On Aug. 25, 2012, 6:07 a.m., Ali Saidi wrote:
> > src/cpu/checker/cpu.hh, line 1
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1371/diff/1/?file=29204#file29204line1>
> >
> >     oops

That's what happens when you are on dodgy X session over 3G :)


> On Aug. 25, 2012, 6:07 a.m., Ali Saidi wrote:
> > src/cpu/checker/cpu.hh, line 126
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1371/diff/1/?file=29204#file29204line126>
> >
> >     assert icache Port?

Both will do. I guess I am used to the old-school SPARC machines where NULL was 
0x4 instead of 0x0...I'm not sure we have to design for that though. Will bump


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1371/#review3322
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 25, 2012, 4:01 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1371/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 25, 2012, 4:01 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9168:8bc6ce06d039
> ---------------------------
> Checker: Fix checker CPU ports
> 
> This patch updates how the checker CPU handles the ports such that the
> regressions will once again run without causing a panic.
> 
> A minor amount of tidying up was also done as part of this patch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/checker/cpu.hh 1d983855df2c 
>   src/cpu/checker/cpu.cc 1d983855df2c 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1371/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran the failing realview-o3-checker regression with stats from next patch
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to