----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1419/#review3470 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/mem/ruby/common/Address.cc <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1419/#comment3514> int64_t to be in line with the rest of gem5? src/mem/ruby/common/TypeDefines.hh <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1419/#comment3515> Take the plunge and use src/base/types.hh, i.e. uint64_t and int64_t? - Andreas Hansson On Sept. 13, 2012, 7:58 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1419/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 13, 2012, 7:58 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 9225:f2888917f08e > --------------------------- > ruby: eliminate typedef integer_t > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/ruby/common/Address.cc be1c1059438b > src/mem/ruby/common/TypeDefines.hh be1c1059438b > src/mem/ruby/profiler/Profiler.hh be1c1059438b > src/mem/ruby/profiler/Profiler.cc be1c1059438b > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1419/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Nilay Vaish > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
