-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1421/#review3471
-----------------------------------------------------------


Make it check if not 32 or 64? Would that be reasonable? If not I'm happy to 
discard the warning.

- Andreas Hansson


On Sept. 13, 2012, 11:37 a.m., Anthony Gutierrez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1421/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 13, 2012, 11:37 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9224:a1a9c14e69b9
> ---------------------------
> bus: removed outdated warn regarding 64 B block sizes
> 
> this warn is outdated as 64 B blocks are very common, and even
> the default size for some CPU types. E.g., arm_detailed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/bus.cc be1c1059438bbf7d181dc95a61ec685c2a52c696 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1421/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anthony Gutierrez
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to