Do you mean the physmem attached to the ruby ports and the memvec in DirectoryMemory? I hope with your recent functional access update to the network messages, we can finally get rid of the former, though I'm not sure how we would handle pio acceses.
If you start down that path, let us know. Derek recently asked about the same thing. Brad Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Nilay<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: 2/22/2013 12:06 PM To: Beckmann, Brad<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Ruby: multiple copies of physical memory Hi Brad Can you remind me why we need two copies of memory when we are running with Ruby? Do you have some view on what needs to be done to remove one of the copies? -- Nilay _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
