-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1821/#review4230
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Looks fine to me. Thank you for posting the change. My only concern is that 
there might be an issue running on a 64 bit host and simulating a 32 bit system 
or the reverse because the unsigned long that is being passed will be different 
lengths??



- Ali Saidi


On April 10, 2013, 8:15 a.m., Michael Adler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1821/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 10, 2013, 8:15 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Two patches for user mode (based on 20130123-gem5-stable-f75ee4849c40):
> 
> - Implement getdents/getdents64 syscalls in user mode.
> - Change mmap fixed address request to return an error if the mapping is 
> impossible due to conflict instead of what I believe used to be silent 
> corruption.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1821/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> getdents is tested for Alpha.  I implemented for other ISAs but did not 
> compile.
> 
> mmap to fixed address is permitted to return an error if the address is 
> unavailable, so the change appears better than before.  Workloads appear 
> stable.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael Adler
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to