-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1838/#review4321
-----------------------------------------------------------


IIRC, you had previously stated that a multi-layered bus means that the bus has 
multiple
virtual channels that are multiplexed on to the same physical channel. The 
description 
of this patch seems to imply that layers are actually different physical 
channels.

- Nilay Vaish


On April 22, 2013, 3:43 p.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1838/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 22, 2013, 3:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9679:7e980b7d406c
> ---------------------------
> mem: Make the buses multi layered
> 
> This patch makes the buses multi layered, and effectively creates a
> crossbar structure with distributed contention ports at the
> destination ports. Before this patch, a bus could have a single
> request, response and snoop response in flight at any time, and with
> these changes there can be as many requests as connected slaves (bus
> master ports), and as many responses as connected masters (bus slave
> ports).
> 
> Together with address interleaving, this patch enables us to create
> high-throughput memory interconnects, e.g. 50+ GByte/s.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/bus.hh c5b24e8ed428 
>   src/mem/bus.cc c5b24e8ed428 
>   src/mem/coherent_bus.hh c5b24e8ed428 
>   src/mem/coherent_bus.cc c5b24e8ed428 
>   src/mem/noncoherent_bus.hh c5b24e8ed428 
>   src/mem/noncoherent_bus.cc c5b24e8ed428 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1838/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All regressions passing after stats updates
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to