-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1874/#review4346
-----------------------------------------------------------


Think how GCC or any other compiler would solve such a problem.

- Nilay Vaish


On May 18, 2013, 1:53 p.m., Malek Musleh wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1874/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 18, 2013, 1:53 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 9705:fdcb243a7ffd
> ---------------------------
> ruby: rename wakeUpBuffer Function
> 
> The wakeUpAllBuffers() routine is defined and overloaded in the 
> AbstractController class. However, wanting to include both versions: 
> wakeUpAllBuffers() and wakeUpAllBuffers(Address a) in a slicc protocol file 
> results in a compilation error:
> Exception: MOESI_CMP_directory-L1cache.sm:284: Error: Symbol 
> 'wakeUpAllBuffers' redeclared in same scope.:
> 
> Not sure how else to expose overloaded functions to the slicc files.
> 
> Testing:
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.hh 
> 00dca8a9b5606900410248f998d28d36e4faf75b 
>   src/mem/ruby/slicc_interface/AbstractController.cc 
> 00dca8a9b5606900410248f998d28d36e4faf75b 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1874/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Malek Musleh
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to