-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2072/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Nov. 4, 2013, 9:44 a.m.)


Review request for Default.


Changes
-------

A mistake made in LRU::accessBlock function. The "lat" parameter has to be 
passed by reference (not by value). Sorry...


Repository: gem5


Description
-------

This patch allows specifying different cache latency for read and write access. 
(In the code, the hit_latency parameter is actually the read_latency)


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/mem/cache/BaseCache.py 07352f119e48 
  src/mem/cache/base.hh 07352f119e48 
  src/mem/cache/base.cc 07352f119e48 
  src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh 07352f119e48 
  src/mem/cache/tags/lru.cc 07352f119e48 

Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2072/diff/


Testing
-------

I used --debug-flags command to check read hit latency and write hit latency 
for Dcache and Icache. I checked the time between a request sent by the cpu and 
the response sent by the cache memory.


Thanks,

Sophiane SENNI

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to