> On Jan. 6, 2014, 1:32 a.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> > I'd like to understand a little better exactly what problem this is 
> > solving.  Like Ali, I'm sort of concerned about exposing something like 
> > this unless it's really necessary.  For example, if you want to move 
> > curTick() ahead to a certain point, you can always to that by scheduling an 
> > event.  I can believe that that's not the most convenient thing, but I'd 
> > like to be convinced that it's so inconvenient that this function really is 
> > necessary before we add this method.

I'm trying to get the unit tests to compile.

Since curTick(newVal) has been removed, I needed another way to set the tick 
value for the current queue.

I've updated review request #2133. Now stattest works without adding a 
setCurTick function in core.

So, if you accept #2133, this patch is no longer needed. Should I close it?


- Ola


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2135/#review4857
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 28, 2013, 7:37 p.m., Ola Jeppsson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2135/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 28, 2013, 7:37 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10004:7c8348d23222
> ---------------------------
> sim: core: add setCurTick() function
> Add setCurTick() function that sets the simulation clock for the current
> event queue to the specified value.
> ---
>  src/sim/core.hh | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> This is needed for a patch I have to make unittest:stattest work again.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/sim/core.hh 4b872fdba3af 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2135/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ola Jeppsson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to