-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2161/#review4903
-----------------------------------------------------------


I don't follow your rationale, but I don't see any harm in what you're doing 
either... but I think you're doing it awkwardly ;-).


src/dev/SConscript
<http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2161/#comment4570>

    If you want these files to be compiled in unconditionally, why not just 
list them once above the if instead of listing them twice?
    
    


- Steve Reinhardt


On Feb. 13, 2014, 6:39 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2161/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 13, 2014, 6:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10065:573eff8aee0c
> ---------------------------
> dev: Include basic devices in NULL ISA build
> 
> This patch enbles use of the basic PIO devices as part of the NULL
> build. Although it might seem counter intuitive to have a PIO device
> without being able to execute a driver, this change enables us to
> break a device class hierarchy into an ISA-agnostic part, and an
> ISA-specific part, without requiring multiple-inheritance. The
> ISA-agnostic base class is a PIO device, but does not make use of the
> port.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/dev/SConscript 3b0d0c988ed6 
>   src/dev/baddev.cc 3b0d0c988ed6 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2161/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> All regressions pass
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to