Hi Nilay,

Your last push seems to have broken at least one regression X86, 00.hello, 
simple-timing-ruby, as it currently segfaults. I suspect it is due to the fact 
that it tries to forward an address-range change without actually having a pio 
port connected. Perhaps there are more, this is merely the result of running 
the quick regressions for a few ISAs.

When looking closer at the code, I am also not sure what about the counting 
done in recvRangeChange, PioMasterPort in RubyPort.cc. A module may send out 
many of these updates, so counting does not seem safe to me. Have a look at 
mem/bus.cc for an example (that is even worse since we also have to deal with 
the default range).

Thanks,

Andreas

-- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.

ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, Registered 
in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590
ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, 
Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to