Hi Steve,

Thanks for sending these patches out. I just saw this email and I am actually 
on gem5-dev list with a different email address. Please let me know if you need 
me to do anything.

Binh
On Jun 22, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Steve Reinhardt via gem5-dev <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> The prior patches were attributed to Binh Pham, who is not on the gem5-dev
> list, and apparently the commit messages got rejected because of that.  See
> http://repo.gem5.org/gem5 for the changeset descriptions:
> 
> *27 hours ago**Binh Pham**x86: fix table walker assertion*
> <http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/rev/1444f2ee67d7>changeset
> <http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/rev/1444f2ee67d7> | files
> <http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/file/1444f2ee67d7>*28 hours ago**Binh Pham**o3:
> make dispatch LSQ full check more selective*
> <http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/rev/15f822e9410a>changeset
> <http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/rev/15f822e9410a> | files
> <http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/file/15f822e9410a>*28 hours ago**Binh Pham**o3:
> split load & store queue full cases in rename*
> <http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/rev/592f0bb6bd6f>changeset
> <http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/rev/592f0bb6bd6f> | files
> <http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/file/592f0bb6bd6f>
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Steve Reinhardt via gem5-dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> changeset cb4e86c17767 in /z/repo/gem5
>> details: http://repo.gem5.org/gem5?cmd=changeset;node=cb4e86c17767
>> description:
>>        stats: update for O3 changes
>> 
>>        Mostly small differences in total ticks, but O3 stall causes
>>        shifted significantly.
>> 
>>        30.eon does speed up by ~6% on Alpha and ARM, and 50.vortex
>>        by 4.5% on ARM.  At the other extreme, X86 70.twolf is 0.8%
>>        slower.
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to