-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2306/#review5179
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Ali Saidi


On July 3, 2014, 5:12 p.m., Steve Reinhardt wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2306/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 3, 2014, 5:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10252:62ffe6aa9285
> ---------------------------
> syscall emulation: fix DPRINTF arg ordering bug
> 
> When we switched getSyscallArg() from explicit arg indices to
> the implicit method, some DPRINTF arguments were left as calls
> to getSyscallArg(), even though C/C++ doesn't guarantee
> anything about the order of invocation of these calls.  As a
> result, the args could be printed out in arbitrary orders.
> 
> Interestingly, this bug has been around since 2009:
> http://repo.gem5.org/gem5/rev/4842482e1bd1
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/sim/syscall_emul.cc 878f2f30b12d38f619b80b5d80d52498946f6ad1 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2306/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve Reinhardt
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to