-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2400/#review5326
-----------------------------------------------------------


Thanks for finding this Andrew. Could you try to change the order of the PQ 
(e.g. std::priority_queue<unsigned, vector<unsigned>, std::greater<unsigned>> 
PQ) which will sort it the other way. I think that would be a bit clearer than 
the multiplication by -1.

Ali

- Ali Saidi


On Sept. 10, 2014, 7:09 p.m., Andrew Lukefahr wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2400/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 10, 2014, 7:09 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10366:3574985d085f
> ---------------------------
> Fixed IQCount
> 
> IQCount gave priority to the thread with the highest number of instructions 
> in the Instruction Queue, rather than the least.  
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/o3/fetch_impl.hh e2c43045a81b 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2400/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Lukefahr
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to