----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2404/#review5340 -----------------------------------------------------------
I'm just curious to know, do you think we will manage to eventually get the network power online again? It just seems unfortunate that we have to rely on post processing. I see how it is a step-wise modification, but perhaps it would be worth keeping parts of this if we will eventually go back to calling the power models while running. We are about to add DRAMPower to ext to achieve exactly what I describe above. Ultimately I think it is better if the power numbers are available on-line. Less traces, less scripts, the possibility to do on-line power-aware decisions etc. - Andreas Hansson On Sept. 18, 2014, 9:23 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2404/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Sept. 18, 2014, 9:23 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 10373:f72ea8945c90 > --------------------------- > ruby: network: garnet: remove functions for computing power > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/GarnetNetwork_d.hh 4466307b8a2a > src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/GarnetNetwork_d.cc 4466307b8a2a > src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/NetworkLink_d.hh 4466307b8a2a > src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/Router_d.hh 4466307b8a2a > src/mem/ruby/network/garnet/fixed-pipeline/Router_d.cc 4466307b8a2a > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2404/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Nilay Vaish > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
