> On Nov. 18, 2014, 3:36 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> > src/mem/port_proxy.cc, line 80
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2492/diff/1/?file=42518#file42518line80>
> >
> >     Do we need this scope resolution?

We do. It took me the better part of a day to track it down even...


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2492/#review5468
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 17, 2014, 6:14 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2492/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 17, 2014, 6:14 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10542:6cbdd036f4b9
> ---------------------------
> mem: Use const pointers for port proxy write functions
> 
> This patch changes the various write functions in the port proxies
> to use const pointers for all sources (similar to how memcpy works).
> 
> The one unfortunate aspect is the need for a const_cast in the packet,
> to avoid having to juggle a const and a non-const data pointer. This
> design decision can always be re-evaluated at a later stage.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/mem/fs_translating_port_proxy.hh 1a9e235cab09 
>   src/mem/fs_translating_port_proxy.cc 1a9e235cab09 
>   src/mem/packet.hh 1a9e235cab09 
>   src/mem/port_proxy.hh 1a9e235cab09 
>   src/mem/port_proxy.cc 1a9e235cab09 
>   src/mem/se_translating_port_proxy.hh 1a9e235cab09 
>   src/mem/se_translating_port_proxy.cc 1a9e235cab09 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2492/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Hansson
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
gem5-dev@gem5.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to