> On Nov. 18, 2014, 3:36 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote: > > src/mem/port_proxy.cc, line 80 > > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2492/diff/1/?file=42518#file42518line80> > > > > Do we need this scope resolution?
We do. It took me the better part of a day to track it down even... - Andreas ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2492/#review5468 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 17, 2014, 6:14 a.m., Andreas Hansson wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2492/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 17, 2014, 6:14 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 10542:6cbdd036f4b9 > --------------------------- > mem: Use const pointers for port proxy write functions > > This patch changes the various write functions in the port proxies > to use const pointers for all sources (similar to how memcpy works). > > The one unfortunate aspect is the need for a const_cast in the packet, > to avoid having to juggle a const and a non-const data pointer. This > design decision can always be re-evaluated at a later stage. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/fs_translating_port_proxy.hh 1a9e235cab09 > src/mem/fs_translating_port_proxy.cc 1a9e235cab09 > src/mem/packet.hh 1a9e235cab09 > src/mem/port_proxy.hh 1a9e235cab09 > src/mem/port_proxy.cc 1a9e235cab09 > src/mem/se_translating_port_proxy.hh 1a9e235cab09 > src/mem/se_translating_port_proxy.cc 1a9e235cab09 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2492/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Andreas Hansson > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev