> On Nov. 19, 2014, 4:45 p.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote: > > src/dev/x86/Pc.py, line 54 > > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2515/diff/1/?file=42652#file42652line54> > > > > I might be confused by the weird semantics of the gem5 configuration > > scripts, but isn't this killing the fake device for port 0x80?
Hmm, yes. The peril of making these changes late at night when it's time to go home. - Gabe ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2515/#review5490 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 19, 2014, 9:26 a.m., Gabe Black wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2515/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 19, 2014, 9:26 a.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 10550:9fcdf186d7ba > --------------------------- > x86: pc: Put a stub IO device at port 0xed which the kernel can use for > delays. > > There was already a stub device at 0x80, the port traditionally used for an IO > delay. 0x80 is also the port used for POST codes sent by firmware, and that > may have prompted adding this port as a second option. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/dev/x86/Pc.py 288eb5ee4b0026d0cc1f02ec31748e0eaac06bc3 > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2515/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Gabe Black > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
