> On April 9, 2015, 6:06 p.m., Ali Saidi wrote: > >
Sorry, my comments disappeared somewhere. Does this change allow for gem5 to compile on FreeBSD? gem5 to run a FreeBSD binary? Both? If it's the prior, it would be good to allow any type of binary to run on any host OS. If it's the latter, I think this could should be made generic, some of it moved into arm/linux and arm/freebsd should be created? - Ali ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2732/#review6033 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 9, 2015, 4:42 p.m., Ruslan Bukin wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2732/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 9, 2015, 4:42 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Some of AT relocation types are Linux-specific, so do not set it on FreeBSD > > Assuming this code is run in Syscall Emulation mode only, we can rely on a > host system and use defines (some OS-abstraction here might be better idea, > but not sure how to do that) > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/arch/arm/process.cc 235ff1c046df > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2732/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Tested on FreeBSD host SE mode > > > Thanks, > > Ruslan Bukin > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
