Both sound fine to me. Steve
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Andreas Hansson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > With the recent removal of the old InOrderCPU, I’d suggest we proceed and > rename MinorCPU to InOrderCPU. This will mark the final step in the > transition. Let me know if you disagree or think it is too early. > > A follow-on issue is that the status matrix is horribly out of date, and I > suggest as part of this name change we update and simplify the matrix. To > make things easier I’d suggest to break out the Ruby coherence protocols, > and have a single column for Ruby on the overall status page, and then a > second page with all the gory details. > > In short, do you agree/disagree with the following: > > 1. Renaming MinorCPU to InOrderCPU > > 2. Update and split the status matrix to have a single Ruby column > > Thanks, > > Andreas > > > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you. > > ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, > Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 > ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, > Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 > _______________________________________________ > gem5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
