> On May 12, 2015, 3:24 p.m., Jason Power wrote:
> > configs/ruby/MESI_Three_Level.py, line 106
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2776/diff/1/?file=45127#file45127line106>
> >
> >     Should these changes be in a different patch since they are orthogonal 
> > to the Ruby tester?
> >     
> >     I would be OK to keep them here, but you should update the commit 
> > message to say you change the clock domain for all of the controllers.
> 
> Brad Beckmann wrote:
>     Without this change, the Ruby tester does not work when multiple CPUs are 
> specified.  I believe this is the bug that Nilay discussed a few weeks ago.
>     
>     We can update the commit message if you'd like.

Thanks!


> On May 12, 2015, 3:24 p.m., Jason Power wrote:
> > src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc, line 298
> > <http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2776/diff/1/?file=45140#file45140line298>
> >
> >     I don't understand why the random tester doesn't want to retry failed 
> > requests. Could you explain why this feature is necessary? It's been a few 
> > years since I've looked deeply at the random tester. I'll hold off on 
> > broadcasting my opinion on this until I understand it better :).
> >     
> >     Again, this may be more appropriate as a separate patch, but I'm not 
> > going to push hard on this.
> 
> Brad Beckmann wrote:
>     The ruby tester was never designed to handle failed request.  The ruby 
> tester is designed to send large amount of racey requests to stress the 
> protocol logic.  It does this by avoiding flow control and retries.

Ok, I understand this a little better now. One more question, though. Why is it 
that the RubyPort must be set to ignore retries and it's not the responsibility 
of the tester to ignore retries? I think this may be just an issue with the way 
the RubyPort is designed, but I'm trying to get a good understanding of it.

Overall, it's not very important to me. This code is only used when testing, 
and it's explicitly noted in the code. So if it's difficult to move this logic 
into the tester instead of the port this code is OK with me.


- Jason


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2776/#review6171
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 11, 2015, 10:28 p.m., Tony Gutierrez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2776/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 11, 2015, 10:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10833:e624796bae17
> ---------------------------
> ruby: cleaner ruby tester support
> 
> This patch allows the ruby random tester to use ruby ports that may only
> support instr or data requests.  This patch is similar to a previous changeset
> (8932:1b2c17565ac8) that was unfortunately broken by subsequent changesets.
> This current patch implements the support in a more straight-forward way.
> The patch also includes better DPRINTFs and generalizes the retry behavior
> needed by the ruby tester so that other testers/cpu models can use it as well.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   configs/example/ruby_random_test.py 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MESI_Three_Level.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MESI_Two_Level.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MI_example.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MOESI_CMP_directory.py 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MOESI_CMP_token.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   configs/ruby/MOESI_hammer.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/Check.cc fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/CheckTable.cc 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/RubyTester.hh 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/RubyTester.cc 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/cpu/testers/rubytest/RubyTester.py 
> fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/mem/packet_queue.cc fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.hh fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
>   src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.py fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2776/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tony Gutierrez
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to