> On May 12, 2015, 10:03 p.m., Jason Power wrote: > > Cool. Are you planning on updating the mainline protocols to use these in > > the future? Or just new protocols?
Just new protocols. - Brad ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2795/#review6217 ----------------------------------------------------------- On May 11, 2015, 10:22 p.m., Tony Gutierrez wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2795/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated May 11, 2015, 10:22 p.m.) > > > Review request for Default. > > > Repository: gem5 > > > Description > ------- > > Changeset 10852:cb151892ed2a > --------------------------- > ruby: give access to cache tag/data latencies from SLICC > > This patch exposes the tag and data array latencies to the SLICC state > machines > so that it can be used to determine the correct enqueue latency for response > messages. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/protocol/RubySlicc_Types.sm > fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec > src/mem/ruby/structures/BankedArray.hh > fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec > src/mem/ruby/structures/CacheMemory.hh > fbdaa08aaa426b9f4660c366f934ccb670d954ec > > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2795/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Tony Gutierrez > > _______________________________________________ gem5-dev mailing list gem5-dev@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
