On Tue, 19 May 2015, Sooraj Puthoor wrote:
On May 12, 2015, 8:47 p.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
There are two problems I have with this patch. Firstly, it changes the
generally
accepted meaning of '*'. Secondly, it is adding another keyword to the language
which is, in my opinion, not required. Instead, the transition construct should
be upgraded so that it recognizes that the final state argument can be anything
whose type
is state. This would allow us to name the function whatever we want it to be.
Brad Beckmann wrote:
What do you mean it changes the meaning of '*'? That symbol is not
currently used in SLICC. SLICC has been designed not to directly expose
pointers to the programmer, so the '*' symbol is currently unused.
Upgrading the transistion construct requires a pretty significant change to
the parser. The current patch is much cleaner and the notation is simplier.
Hi Nilay, The thought behind the use of '*' was that the nextState could
be anystate returned by the getNextState() function....It simply means
we do not know the state in advance... Please let us know if you have
any other symbol in mind which can better represent this behaviour....
I understand the thinking behind using '*'. I don't understand why do we
want to fix the associated function's name and its set of parameters. I
think we should be more general over here. I would against suggest that
we allow 'expr' instead of 'ident' as next_state token. In
TransitionDeclAST.py, we should check that the type of the next_state is
State, which we always assume exists.
--
Nilay
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
