On Fri, 22 May 2015, Nathanael Premillieu wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2829/#review6387
-----------------------------------------------------------
Good work, but I think the width should be defined at the bit level not
at the byte level, to be more generic. Although you've done this change
for simd, it could be used for other type of operations.
Can you give an example operation where bit-level would be better?
--
Nilay
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
