-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2774/#review6498
-----------------------------------------------------------


Can you give a more detailed example as to what's wrong with the current 
version?

- Nilay Vaish


On May 11, 2015, 3:52 p.m., Nikos Nikoleris wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2774/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 11, 2015, 3:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Repository: gem5
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Changeset 10833:9fd3d5837e1e
> ---------------------------
> cpu, kvm: Don't flag TC as dirty after m5op
> 
> Currently, none of the m5ops changes the TC, and therefore it cannot be
> dirty. Syncing the TC results in incorrect register state for the
> simulated system, since the kernel will first emulate the instruction
> and then update the guest's register state.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/kvm/base.cc fbdaa08aaa42 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2774/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nikos Nikoleris
> 
>

_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to