On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Joel Hestness wrote:
On July 23, 2015, 10:01 p.m., Tony Gutierrez wrote:
This patch seems ok, but can you hold off on pushing this and other ruby
related changes until we push our patches. We plan to ship our patches by next
Friday (07/31).
I also feel that these changes are ok. The sender and receiver pointers are a
bit strange for MessageBuffers, so I support removing them.
I suspect there will be merging headaches with the
MessageBuffers->SimObjects patch (2845:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/2845/), and I'm hoping we can resolve a
reasonable agreement on push order. AMD has given close-to-final
feedback on 2845, but I haven't heard from you, Nilay. Would you be ok
waiting on this patch until 2845 is in?
Yes. I'll be merging my patches with the ones already on the review
board. I'll take another look at your patch sometime soon.
--
Nilay
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
